
Also, I really loved Fermina's husband and the descriptions of him. I didn't understand why Marquez spent so much time describing him (some 50 pages in the beginning of the book) just to kill him off. Also, really, how long can infatuation last when you've never actually talked to the subject of your fascination? I just didn't get it and I was bored to tears. I hate to admit it but I never made it more than halfway through this book. Someone out there, please convince me there is some reason I should try to pick this book up again.

Having already made two attempts to move abroad, I was curious to find out how he actually made it work and learn what steps I could take to finally become a wanderer myself. I didn't find the book to be that helpful, however. He talked about the reasons we travel and what-not. But when you've already picked up his book, it's obvious you don't need any extra encouragement. What you need is resources to get you on the road! He does provide resources ... in the form of URLs to visit and other books to read ... resources you can just as easily find on his Web site. The book was only about 200 pages so it was quick to get through, but I highly recommend just checking out his Web site and his video on Google Talks. You'll get pretty much the same information by doing so.

I chose to read Dematerializing because I thought it would have some interesting insight into why we buy things and perhaps some tips on how to get rid of all the extra stuff we somehow accumulate in our homes. The book turned out to be a lot more about the psychology behind buying things and what advertisers do to draw us in. There were also a lot of weird feminist leanings to the book, which I wouldn't normally mind, but I didn't get this book to read about how advertising demoralizes women. If that were what I was going for, I would have bought the much better written and researched, although ancient, Can't Buy My Love by Jean Kilbourne.
To be fair, I think the other reason this book bothered me so much was that it didn't say anything I didn't already know, but perhaps that is because I'm reading it several years after it was first published. Maybe her observations about media's influence on us was a new phenomenon a few years back (although I highly doubt it).
OK then, I'm glad to have those off my conscience. Now I can look forward to my next two book reviews. Also, watch for an interview with Joshua Henkin, author of Matrimony, later this week. Hope you're all having a great Memorial Day!
7 comments:
I know you said you wanted to hear from those who like the books, but I have to say--Love in the Time of Cholera was PAINFUL for me to finish. I did not find the "love" story to be a true depiction of love at all, and the story line goes from bad to worse--in my opinion. However, I know there are many out there who really really liked it!
I have trouble writing about books I have no strong feelings about too.
I absolutely loved Love in the Time of Cholera, but I don't think you are missing anything. For every person that loves that book there's another that doesn't...it's one that seems to polarize opinions.
"Also, really, how long can infatuation last when you've never actually talked to the subject of your fascination?"
This is a good point. And I was honestly surprised that the book grabbed me the way it did when I'm really not one to believe in love at first sight or love when you barely know the person. I'll tell you one thing: things change a lot in the last third of the book and I found the ending absolutely beautiful. But I'm not sure if I'd tell you to pick it up again, because it it hasn't worked for you so far, it might just never work at all.
Nymeth, Laura: Thanks so much for your comments. I passed the book on to one of my friends yesterday and I'm curious to see which side of the fence she'll fall to.
Look at you! Your site is getting pretty popular nowadays. I read "Falling Through the Earth" per your recommendation. It was pretty sad overall, but I really enjoyed the ending. The guy in the Iron Maiden shirt freaked me out. I thought for sure that he was going to end up being her father's kid or maybe the kid of one of the guys in her dad's platoon. I hope Danielle ends up writing more books. You should try to get an interview with her. She seems like she would be accessible.
you said I hope youre all having a good memorial day, but i didn't, not really, I ate too much and now my stomach hurts and I think I look pretty fat. But, yeah, Love in the time of whateves was boring- I recommend Ask the Dust by John Fante, but not the movie, cause i just don't believe Collin Farrell as a virgin, ya know?
You concentrate too much on plot. There's a lot more to most books than that, unless you're reading Sophie Kinsella--
Marquez was a magical realism writer. His books are lavish, beautiful love stories, not meant to be "realistic." A good writer knows exactly what he's doing, and Marquez is a good writer. If Marquez spent fifty pages on the doctor then he had a reason for it.
And Marquez's books were utterly original. Very little had been written in a similar style before Marquez and the ensuing crop of magical realism writers.
Said the author, "My most important problem was destroying the line of demarcation that separates what seems real from what seems fantastic."
Yes, he knew exactly what he was doing.
Lia: Thanks for the comment. I think that Marquez writes beautifully, but I still have to say I didn't enjoy the book because I wasn't drawn into the story. It doesn't matter how wonderfully you can put prose down on a page if people can't stay interested in what it is you're saying. I know many people do love this book though. It just didn't do it for me.
Post a Comment